<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#039;Reilly Factor Paparazzis Alan Grayson to Prove How Much of a Real News Channel Fox Is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2009/10/29/oreilly-factor-paparazzis-alan-grayson-to-prove-how-much-of-a-real-news-channel-fox-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2009/10/29/oreilly-factor-paparazzis-alan-grayson-to-prove-how-much-of-a-real-news-channel-fox-is/</link>
	<description>The blog by and for comedy nerds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:14:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Arnold</title>
		<link>http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2009/10/29/oreilly-factor-paparazzis-alan-grayson-to-prove-how-much-of-a-real-news-channel-fox-is/comment-page-1/#comment-97857</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/?p=12838#comment-97857</guid>
		<description>Let me start off by saying I love your show and uncanny way that you put politicians back into perspective by using intelligent satire. I would enjoy your show even more if the &quot;F&quot; word would not be used. Even though it is bleeped out, the thought still registers in the brain. The use of the word lowers the high level of class that your show has, which is meant in a positive way. I also would like to extend this same message to the Corbett Report. In addition, I that word was cut; I would feel at ease to recommend the shows to many of my friends that are inclined to be sensitive to hearing it on TV as well as in movies on pay TV. I actually turn off a movie if the F word is used in access. I am not an eccentric goody two shoes, it is just that word sounds just too ugly and there is too much ugly in the world today as is. I thought that is why The Dailey Show and The Colbert Report exist, to poke at the ugly stuff from DC, the world and Hollywood. Thanks, Craig Arnold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me start off by saying I love your show and uncanny way that you put politicians back into perspective by using intelligent satire. I would enjoy your show even more if the &#034;F&#034; word would not be used. Even though it is bleeped out, the thought still registers in the brain. The use of the word lowers the high level of class that your show has, which is meant in a positive way. I also would like to extend this same message to the Corbett Report. In addition, I that word was cut; I would feel at ease to recommend the shows to many of my friends that are inclined to be sensitive to hearing it on TV as well as in movies on pay TV. I actually turn off a movie if the F word is used in access. I am not an eccentric goody two shoes, it is just that word sounds just too ugly and there is too much ugly in the world today as is. I thought that is why The Dailey Show and The Colbert Report exist, to poke at the ugly stuff from DC, the world and Hollywood. Thanks, Craig Arnold</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

